![seton hall diplomacy and international relations books seton hall diplomacy and international relations books](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ec2a82b8-10f8-46ae-bc13-142a24b18af6-170125153429/95/meyer-resume-dec-16-1-638.jpg)
![seton hall diplomacy and international relations books seton hall diplomacy and international relations books](https://1n6yee3yf9w6rficx2tdzl9s-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/4195392170289.jpeg)
Other programs at that level at least are widely known and are featured in that (no doubt somewhat dubious) FP magazine ranking table. I take it that you'd classify SHU as a "borderline school" (per the other thread). Mostly I would counsel you to not pay full-price tuition there if it's anywhere near as high as Hopkins/Columbia/Tufts.
![seton hall diplomacy and international relations books seton hall diplomacy and international relations books](https://www.shu.edu/images/diplomacy_ma-diplomacy-international-relations.png)
I've met a couple grads from there and they were in management at a top international affairs school, so not a bad gig, if not the most competitive. After that, your work history will take off and be by far the most important factor. What's most important is your writing ability and selling skills if you can get in the interview seat. You'll likely struggle a bit to be taken as seriously as Fletcher/SAIS/SIPA grads throughout your career and you'll probably have to scrounge more for that initial internship and job offer, but honestly it doesn't really matter all that much. Simply reading my entire post probably would have cleared up any confusion you might have had. You just copy and pasted one sentence out of context, which significantly altered my overall point. FBI, State (especially), Treasury, Energy, and the White House (NSC, etc) all recruit heavily from the most elite schools, but these days being a veteran matters far more than anything else because of the preference system.īut do keep in mind - school 'eliteness' is not a huge factor and one I downplayed quite a lot in my post. Same goes for federal jobs - it matters A LOT where you go to school for the more elite agencies. the more elite schools like SAIS/SIPA/Fletcher. This credibility, or 'being taken seriously' gap certainly would apply to Seton Hall vs. Same in International Affairs a significantly more elite school will give you a few more browny points and - all else equal - few more second looks at your resume and more built-in credibility. So for example, those who go to University of Chicago's business school (Booth) will get a few more appreciative 'oohs' and 'ahhs' than those who go to Foster at the University of Washington. Going to a significantly more elite school generally gives one a bit more of a credibility boost through their career. What's your beef with it? (sorry, couldn't resist). In fact this is certainly not my experience at all. Could you please clarify? I don't usually weigh in on threads (long time lurker!) But I have to say that I do not agree with this statement at all and I am struggling to understand what your factual basis is.